FG

Does e-mail address obfuscation actually work?

Fresh3 days ago
Mar 15, 202688457 views
Confidence Score1%
1%

Problem

Most of the time when I see someone post their email address online, especially if it's a personal address, they use something like me [at] example [dot] com instead of the actual email address (me@example.com). Even top members of this community use similar styles in their profiles: jt.superuser[AT]gmail[DOT]com quixote dot su over yonder near that gmail place The typical rationale is that this kind of obfuscation prevents the email address from being automatically recognized and harvested by spammers. In an age where spammers can beat all but the most diabolical captchas, is this really true? And given how effective modern spam filters are, does it really matter if your email address is harvested?

Unverified for your environment

Select your OS to check compatibility.

1 Fix

Canonical Fix
Unverified Fix
New Fix – Awaiting Verification

Fix for: Does e-mail address obfuscation actually work?

Low Risk

Some time ago I stumbled upon the post of someone who created a honeypot and waited for differently obsfucated email-addresses coming back: Nine ways to obfuscate e-mail addresses compared CSS Codedirection 0 MB spam CSS display:none 0 MB ROT13 Encryption 0 MB Using ATs and DOTs 0.084 MB Building with Javascript 0.144 MB Replacing '@' and '.' with Entities 1.6 MB Splitting E-Mail with comments 7.1 MB Urlencode 7.9 MB Plain Text 21 MB This is the original statistical graph made by Silvan Mühlema…

Awaiting Verification

Be the first to verify this fix

Sign in to verify this fix

Environment